Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 17;8(3):76–90. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2448

Table 5.

Reactions to fields that fail to meet acceptance criteria, multiple responses accepted

Frequency of responses to the question “If the dose analysis for a beam (measured vs. planned) does NOT pass your standard criteria for passing, how do you respond?”
Response Response frequency (% of N=139)
Examine the field(s) and TPS calculated dose to search for known limitations in the IMRT dose algorithm 71.2%
Examine the other beams in the plan to determine if the magnitude of the error might be significant 61.2%
Change the plan if necessary 51.8%
Examine the delivery records or devices (e.g. machine parameters, log files, physical devices, etc.) for errors 42.4%
Change the criteria to get a higher passing rate and record the justification 39.6%
Change the criteria to get a higher passing rate without recording any justification 6.5%
Not applicable, because my analyses always pass the criteria 2.9%
I do nothing 0.0%
I do something else 59.0%