Table 2.
Baseline | Week 3 | Week 6 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | LV mass | LVPWD | LV mass | LVPWD | LV mass | LVPWD | |
Placebo + sham | 6 | 60 ± 0.8 | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 67 ± 3.5 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 62 ± 3.8 | 0.65 ± 0.04 |
Placebo + TAC | 10 | 54 ± 5.6 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 79 ± 2.9 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 93 ± 5.8* | 0.88 ± 0.03* |
Dabigatran + sham | 7 | 54 ± 2.8 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 62 ± 1.8 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 56 ± 3.2 | 0.62 ± 0.04 |
Dabigatran + TAC | 8 | 62 ± 4.3 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 73 ± 9.5 | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 78 ± 5.8* | 0.81 ± 0.05* |
TAC-induced center ventricular hypertrophy in mice fed placebo or dabigatran etexilate chow. LV mass presented in mg; LVPWd in mm. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak method;
P<0.05 vs corresponding sham. No difference between placebo + TAC and dabigatran + TAC was observed.