Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 8;18:358. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0772-6

Table 2.

Identification of CKD estimated by CKD-EPI, according to levels of eGFR and ACR categories, among 1359 participants in the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX) study, 2007-08, aged 18–69 years

eGFR and ACR categories and risk of adverse outcomes ACR categories (mg/g Cr), description and range
<30 30–300 >300
Normal to mildly increased Moderately increased Severely increased
Normoalbuminuria Microalbuminuria Macroalbuminuria
A1 A2 A3 Total
GFR categories (ml/min/1.73 m2) ≥90 Normal and high G1 923 (70.5%) [199,875] 48 (3.5%) [9983] 6 (0.4%) [1119] 977 (74.4%) [210,978]
60–89 Mild reduction G2 354 (23.6%) [67,172] 12 (0.9%) [2582] 1 (0.1%) [178] 367 (24.7%) [69,933]
30–59.9 Moderate impairment G3 10 (0.6%) [1812] 0 2 (0.1%) [348] 12 (0.8%) [2161]
15–29.9 Severe impairment G4 1 (0.1%) [194] 0 1 (0.1%) [222] 2 (0.1%) [416]
<15 Kidney failure G5 0 0 1 (0.1%) [165] 1 (0.1%) [165]
Total 1288 (94.9%) [269,054] 60 (4.4%) [12,566] 11 (0.7%) [2032] 1359 (100%) [283,652]

Data represent number (%) of participants having the pathology [Estimated population in Luxembourg]. Sample weighting used to present data

ACR albumin: creatinine ratio, CKD chronic kidney disease, GFR glomerular filtration rate

CKD identified in people with GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (GFR categories G3-G5) or markers of kidney damage. In the absence of evidence of kidney damage such as albuminuria, neither eGFR category G1 nor G2 fulfil the criteria for CKD