Table 4.
RKG | R vs. K (n = 20) | R vs. CRs (n = 20) | R vs. CRs (n = 53) |
---|---|---|---|
C | F(1,19) = 11.43, p = 0.003∗ | F(1,19) = 13.22, p = 0.002∗ | F(1,52) = 41.11, p < 0.001∗ |
C×L | F(1,21) = 0.47, p = 0.516 | F(1,21) = 0.17, p = 0.712 | F(1,60) = 9.48, p = 0.002∗ |
C×H | F(1,19) = 1.37, p = 0.257 | F(1,19) = 0.89, p = 0.358 | F(1,52) = 9.04, p = 0.004∗ |
C×L×H | F(1,29) = 1.31, p = 0.279 | F(1,27) = 3.3, p = 0.067 | F(1,74) = 7.04, p = 0.005∗ |
C×S | F(1,20) = 1.6, p = 0.222 | F(1,20) = 4.11, p = 0.055 | F(1,56) = 5.46, p = 0.021∗ |
C×L×S | F(2,46) = 6.54, p = 0.002∗ | F(2,38) = 7.04, p = 0.003∗ | F(2,112) = 9.71, p < 0.001∗ |
C×H×S | F(1,26) = 3.77, p = 0.051 | F(2,30) = 2.1, p = 0.149 | F(1,68) = 15.54, p < 0.001∗ |
C×L×H×S | F(4,68) = 0.28, p = 0.87 | F(2,41) = 1.02, p = 0.373 | F(3,145) = 6.54, p = 0.001∗ |
Analyses included data from 30 electrodes, with factors of Condition (C), Location (L), Hemisphere (H) and Site (S). Significant results (p < 0.05) are highlighted by an asterisk (∗).