Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov 22;6(4):40–49. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v6i4.2137

Table 1.

Comparison between CT and BAT localization

Patient# Template (Y/N) Number of observations Average initial target displacement based on CT (mm) (SD * ) Average residual shift with sign after BAT (mm) (SD * ) [p value] Average absolute residual shift after BAT (mm) (SD * ) Average improvement (mm) (SD * ) [p value]
AP Lat Long AP Lit Long AP Lad Long AP Lit Long
1 N 13 4.3 (1.7) 3.7 (2.9) 5.2 (2.2)
3.9(4.3)
3.9 (3.5)
3.1(3.6)
4.1 (4.1) 4.8 (21) 4.1 (2.5) 0.2 (4.6)
1.0(4.1)
1.1 (2.9)
[0.006] [0.002] [0.008] [0.859] [0.388] [0.208]
2 N 13 2.8 (2.2) 3 3 (1 3) 3.5 (3.3)
3.3(6.0)
3.6 (3.7) 2.5 (4.3) 5.8 (3.5) 4.0 (3.3) 4.1 (2.7)
3.0(2.9)
0.6(3.7)
0.6(3.0)
[0.074] [0.004] [0.054] [0.003] [0.543] [0.509]
3 N 9 2.8 (1.6) 1.8 (0.9) 2.2 (1.7)
3.6(5.4)
1.2 (3.2) 2.7 (3.9) 5.8 (2.5) 2.8 (1.8) 3 6 (2.9)
3.0(3.0)
0.9(2.0)
1.4(3.1)
[0.080] [0.308] [0.070] [0.016] [0.194] [0.206]
4 Y 6 8.0 (3.7) 6.0 (1.8) 4.8 (2.7) 4.3 (3.2)
2.9(1.9)
0.3 (4 5) 4.5 (2.8) 3.2 (1.4) 3.3 (2.6) 3 5 (4 3) 2.8 (2.1) 1.5 (4.1)
[0.022] [0.014] [0.876] [0.102] [0.022] [0.413]
5 Y 7 7.3 (2.9) 5.3 (1.9) 2.4 (1.9)
4.6(3.5)
1.4(3.9)
2.6 (3.0) 5.0 (2.9) 3.3 (2.2) 3.0 (14) 2.3 (3.7) 2.1 (3.2)
0.6(3.3)
(0.013) [0.373] [0.061] [0.146] [0.140] [0.656]
6 Y 10 3.7 (2.3) 2.1 (1.5) 2.3 (1.4)
2.7(3.3)
1.3(2.8)
0.0 (2.3) 3.4 (2.4) 2.5 (1.6) 1.8 (1.3) 0 2 (3.9)
0.5(1.7)
0.5 (2.4)
[0.027] [0.163] [0.968] [0.855] [0.417] [0.545]
7 Y 10 5.2 (4.5) 2.6 (1.8) 1.9 (1.9) 0.2 (1.7) 0.7 (2.1) 0.2 (2.5) 1.3 (1.0) l.9 (1.0) 1.8 (1.6) 3.9 (4.7) 0 8 (1.8) 0.1 (3.1)
[0.735] [0.348] [0.805] [0.029] [0.217] [0.904]
8 Y 11 2.1 (1.0) 2.4 (1.1) 2 9 (1.9) 0.6 (3.0)
1.5(1.4)
1.6 (2.4) 2.5 (1.7) 1.7 (1.1) 2.0 (2.1)
0.4(1.7)
0 6 (0.8) 0.9 (2.3)
[0.553] [0.006] [0.059] [.496] 0.031 [0.202]
9 Y 11 9.4 (2.3) 1.6 (0.7) 2.1 (1.4) 2.9 (1.7)
1.6(2.0)
0.2 (3 3) 3.1 (1.3) 2.2 (1.2) 27 (1.6) 6 3 (2 0)
0.5(1.2)
0.7(2.6)
[0.000] [0.024] [0.815] [0.000] (0.264) [0.617]
*

Standard Deviation