Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Sep 30;134:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.09.009

Table 1.

Accuracy results when the participant was awake.

Age
Group
DAD
Age
(mo)
DAD
Time
with
Owner
(mo)
Total Events Hits Misses False
Alarms
Correct
Rejections
Low
Sensitivity
High
Sensitivity
Overall
Sensitivity
Specificity PPR d’
Adult 23 8 74 3 (4.1%) 32 (43.2%) 5 (6.8%) 34 (45.9%) 100.0% 5.9% 8.6% 87.2% 70.6% −0.232
Adult 14 6 109 10 (9.2%) 44 (40.4%) 16 (14.7%) 39 (35.8%) 18.2% 18.8% 18.5% 70.9% 66.0% −0.344
Adult 28 22 97 12 (12.4%) 29 (29.9%) 13 (13.4%) 43 (44.3%) 43.8% 20.0% 29.3% 76.8% 65.8% 0.187
Adult 29 26 261 57 (21.8%) 68 (26.1%) 77 (29.5%) 59 (22.6%) 45.3% 46.2% 45.6% 43.4% 54.4% −0.277
Adult 43 40 167 35 (21.0%) 43 (25.7%) 43 (25.7%) 46 (27.5%) 75.0% 43.2% 44.9% 51.7% 58.7% −0.086
Adult 21 13 270 43 (15.9%) 90 (33.3%) 46 (17.0%) 91 (33.7%) 50.0% 25.3% 32.3% 66.4% 66.9% −0.034
Adult 28 23 389 49 (12.6%) 145 (37.3%) 60 (15.4%) 135 (34.7%) 28.6% 21.9% 25.3% 69.2% 58.6% −0.163
Youth 104 31 128 24 (18.8%) 34 (26.6%) 33 (25.8%) 37 (28.9%) 25.0% 44.0% 41.4% 52.9% 54.2% −0.146
Youth 99 18 135 9 (6.7%) 46 (34.1%) 31 (23.0%) 49 (36.3%) 20.0% 15.0% 16.4% 61.3% 32.6% −0.693
Youth 17 6 83 3 (3.6%) 42 (50.6%) 5 (6.0%) 33 (39.8%) 0.0% 7.0% 6.7% 86.8% 75.0% −0.381
Youth 15 10 128 12 (9.4%) 51 (39.8%) 14 (10.9%) 51 (39.8%) 30.0% 17.0% 19.0% 78.5% 65.9% −0.088
Youth 17 8 139 24 (17.3%) 41 (29.5%) 18 (12.9%) 56 (40.3%) 33.3% 37.3% 36.9% 75.7% 71.4% 0.363
Youth 43 41 133 28 (21.1%) 51 (38.3%) 30 (22.6%) 24 (18.0%) 50.0% 34.2% 35.4% 44.4% 67.0% −0.513
Youth 34 30 165 14 (8.5%) 70 (42.4%) 12 (7.3%) 69 (41.8%) 28.0% 11.9% 16.7% 85.2% 77.8% 0.078
Total 2278 14.2% 34.5% 17.7% 33.6% 35.9% 26.2% 29.1% 65.5% 61.5% −0.150
Median 134 12.5% 35.7% 15.1% 36.0% 31.7% 20.9% 27.3% 70.1% 65.9% −0.155
Minimum 74 3.6% 25.7% 6.0% 18.0% 0.0% 5.9% 6.7% 43.4% 32.6% −0.693
Maximum 389 21.8% 50.6% 29.5% 45.9% 100.0% 46.2% 45.6% 87.2% 77.8% 0.363