Table 5.
Outcome of interest | Quantitative fidelity findings | Qualitative interview findings | Convergence/ discrepancy/ silence | |
Fidelity findings: | Overall fidelity of content scores | High fidelity (>80%)
|
Overall physiotherapists felt that their fidelity was good. Some adaptations and deviations were discussed as occurring in the delivery of the following aspects of the programme:
|
Convergence |
SOLAS categories scoring <80% fidelity | ||||
Materials | Moderate fidelity (50%–79%)
|
|||
Introduction and review |
|
|||
Review and planning |
|
|||
Fidelity of duration—sessions significantly different to intended duration | ||||
Session 1 |
|
|||
Factors influencing fidelity findings: | Correlation between quantitative variables and fidelity scores | Theme 1: physiotherapist knowledge and experience influenced delivery of SOLAS— education content | Convergence | |
Physiotherapist experience (years qualified) |
|
|||
Physiotherapist group experience (years delivering group physiotherapy) |
|
|||
Physiotherapist post-training evaluation score (%) |
|
Theme 1: physiotherapist knowledge and experience influenced delivery of SOLAS— education content | Convergence | |
Group size (average numbers of participants present) |
|
Theme 3: group size influenced delivery of SOLAS—goal-setting, use of materials | Convergence | |
No corresponding quantitative data | Theme 2: individual needs influenced delivery of SOLAS—education, exercise, goal-setting | Silence | ||
Theme 4: group dynamics influenced delivery of SOLAS—goal-setting | ||||
Theme 5: amount of education content influenced delivery of SOLAS—duration | ||||
Theme 6: resources/materials influenced delivery of SOLAS—education and exercise content |
SOLAS, Self-management of Osteoarthritis and Low back pain through Activity and Skills.
*p<0.001, **p<0.005, ***p<0.05.