Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e015567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015567

Table 2.

Multivariate associations between risk factors and perpetration of physical violence by school staff against students in the past week in Luwero District, Uganda (n=497 staff)

Risk factors Adjusted OR 95% CI p value
Individual factors (staff background characteristics)*
Sex
 Female 1
 Male 1.08 0.72 to 1.61 0.73
Age
 18–29 years 1
 30–39 years 1.75 1.04 to 2.95 0.04
 40+ years 1.09 0.57 to 2.08
Job at school
 Teacher 1
 Headmaster 0.55 0.23 to 1.36 <0.001
 Administrative staff 0.17 0.08 to 0.34
Number of offspring
 0 children 1
 1–2 children 2.65 1.35 to 5.19 0.006
 3+ children 1.52 0.75 to 3.05
Victim of child sexual abuse
 No 1
 Yes 0.34 0.13 to 0.85 0.02
Victim of intimate partner violence
 No 1
 Yes 1.61 1.05 to 2.45 0.03
Use of violence against non-students
 No 1
 Yes 2.23 1.11 to 4.47 0.02
Community factors*
Social norms accepting of physical discipline within community
 Low 1
 Medium 0.93 0.54 to 1.62 0.81
 High 0.84 0.49 to 1.43
Socioeconomic status
 High 1
 Medium 1.18 0.68 to 2.07 0.75
 Low 1.23 0.70 to 2.15
School factors†
Social norms accepting of physical discipline among school staff
 Low 1
 Medium 1.28 0.74 to 2.21 0.67
 High 1.14 0.66 to 2.97
Perceived quality of school climate
 High 1
 Medium 1.47 0.82 to 2.63 0.37
 Low 1.06 0.61 to 1.84
Individual factors (staff attitudes)‡
Personal acceptance of physical discipline
 Low 1
 Medium 0.89 0.50 to 1.56 <0.001
 High 2.22 1.28 to 3.84
Perceived quality of school climate
 High 1
 Medium 0.80 0.46 to 1.36 0.70
 Low 0.85 0.0.48 to 1.50
Job satisfaction
 High 1
 Medium 1.28 0.76 to 2.16 0.46
 Low 1.39 0.81 to 2.39

All analysis conducted using logistic regression with a random effect at the school level to account for clustering. p values derived from likelihood ratio tests. Missing data excluded.

*Adjusted for staff background characteristics and community factors only (model 1).

†Adjusted for staff background characteristics, community factors and school factors (model 2).

‡Adjusted for staff background characteristics, community factors, school factors and staff attitudes (model 3).