Table 3.
Author, year | Type of report | Location of study | Setting of NHS Health Check | Data collection method | Setting for data collection | n | Method of recruitment to study | Participant characteristics | Method of analysis | Overall quality |
Alford33 | Evaluation report | Knowsley | Community | Interviews and focus groups | Not given | 36 | No details given | 19 females, 17 males 13 high risk score, 23 low risk score |
Thematic analysis | Medium |
Baker et al18 | Journal article | Gloucester | 83 general practices | Content analysis of cross-sectional survey | NA | 1011 (43%) | Survey sent to all patients who had completed an NHS Health Check within a 2 month period | 55.2% female 19% 56–60 years 10.8% 40–45 years 96% white British |
Thematic analysis | High |
Chipchase et al34 | Report | East and North Birmingham | 2 general practices | Face-to-face semi-structured interviews | GP surgery | 10 | Attendees to NHS Health Checks in the first 2 weeks of February 2011 received a recruitment letter | 8 females, 2 males | Interpretative phenomeno-logical analysis | High |
Corlett25 | Journal article | London | 4 pharmacies | Telephone interviews with sample of survey respondents | On the telephone | 19 | Invitation for a semi-structured telephone interview included with survey sent to all those who had attended an NHS Health Check within a 4 week period | Not given | Thematic analysis using framework approach | Medium |
NHS Greenwich21 | Report | Greenwich | Community | Open-ended questionnaire, focus groups and in-depth phone interviews | Not given | 612 survey responses 4 focus groups and 31 interviews |
Recruited from community outreach services providing NHS Health Checks | Ethnic minority participants: 42% female | Based on Health Belief Model | Medium |
Ismail and Atkin26 | Journal article | Not specified | General practices | Semistructured interviews | Participants’ homes or NHS premises | 45 baseline 38 follow-up |
Purposive sampling from a list provided by five participating general practices | 21 females, 24 males Average age: 58. Ethnicity: 37 White, 5 South Asian and 3 African Caribbean |
Framework analysis | High |
Jenkinson et al27 | Journal article | Torbay | 4 general practices | Telephone or face-to-face interviews | On the telephone or participants’ homes | 17 | Letters of invitation sent to a random sample identified by general practices from lists stratified by age and gender of those who had not responded to an invitation to an NHS health check within 4 weeks. | 12 females, 5 males 6 employed, 1 unemployed, 10 retired |
Thematic analysis | High |
Krska et al17 | Journal article | Sefton, an area of North West England | 16 general practices | Postal survey with free text responses | NA | 434 (23.4%) | All patients with estimated 10 year CVD risk>20% from the 16 practices were sent a postal survey regardless of whether they had attended an NHS Health Check or not | 19% female 68.2% over 65 99.5% white 7.7% highest quintile of deprivation 13.7% lowest quintile |
Categorisation of responses | Medium |
McNaughton37 | Journal article | North East England (non-specific location) | 5 general practices | Semistructured interviews | Not given | 29 | Invitations to patients from five general practices who had received an NHS Health Check and had an estimated 10 year CVD risk>20% | 10 females, 19 males 24 over 65 years 13 in least deprived quintile |
Thematic analysis | High |
Oswald et al35 | Evaluation report | Teesside | General practices or pharmacies | Telephone semistructured interviews | On the telephone | 8 | Invited by general practices or pharmacies or from a list of patients who had attended an NHS Health Check and agreed to take part in the service evaluation | 6 had attended general practices and two pharmacies | Thematic analysis | Medium |
Perry et al29 | Journal article | Knowsley | Community | Interviews and focus groups | Not given | 36 | Letter or telephone invitation to all 38 people who were at high risk of CVD and had attended an NHS Health Check in the past 12–18 months were invited. The remaining attendees at low risk of CVD were purposively sampled for gender, age, risk score. | 3 focus groups: 1 for high risk scores (6 males), 2 for low risk scores (17 females and 7 males) 6semi-structured interviews (2 females and 4males with high risk score) |
Thematic analysis | High |
Riley et al31 | Journal article | Bristol inner city | Community | Semistructured interviews | Community venues or participants’ homes | 16 | Participants were recruited via their attendance of community outreach events. | 7 females, 9 males All from black and minority ethnic populations |
Thematic analysis | High |
Riley et al30 | Journal article | Bristol | General practices | Face-to-face and telephone semi-structured interviews | On the telephone or in participants’ homes | 28 | Purposive sampling from those identified through a search of patient records for patients who had undertaken an NHS Health Check within the previous 6 months | 16 females, 12 males 23 White British 11 most deprived quintile 11 high (>20%) CVD risk |
Thematic analysis | High |
Shaw et al32 | Journal article | Birmingham and Black Country | General practices and community | Semistructured interviews | Not given | 23 | Patients who had attended an NHS Health Check were invited by practice managers or lead clinicians | High black and minority ethnic population and high levels of deprivation | Thematic analysis | High |
Strutt36 | Masters thesis | Darlington, Co Durham, UK | two general practices | Semistructured face-to-face interviews | Participants’ homes | 16 | Invitation letters or telephone | 7 females, 9 males White, South-Asian and Middle Eastern |
Thematic analysis | High |
CVD, cardiovascular disease; GP, general practitioner; NA, not applicable; NHS, National Health Service.