Table 1.
Coherence Can stakeholders make sense of the intervention? |
Cognitive participation Can stakeholders get others involved in implementing the intervention? |
Collective action What needs to be done to make the intervention work in practice? |
Reflexive monitoring Can the intervention be monitored and evaluated? |
Differentiation:
Do stakeholders see this as a new way working? |
Enrolment:
Do the stakeholders believe they are the correct people to drive forward the implementation? |
Interactional workability:
Does the intervention make it easier or harder to complete tasks? |
Systematisation:
Will stakeholders be able to judge the effectiveness of the intervention? |
Individual specification:
Do individuals understand what tasks the intervention requires of them? |
Initiation:
Are they willing and able to engage others in the implementation? |
Skill set workability:
Do those implementing the intervention have the correct skills and training for the job? |
Individual appraisal:
How will individuals judge the effectiveness of the intervention? |
Communal specification:
Do all those involved agree about the purpose of the intervention? |
Activation:
Can stakeholders identify what tasks and activities are required to sustain the intervention? |
Relational integration:
Do those involved in the implementation have confidence in the new way of working? |
Communal appraisal:
How will stakeholders collectively judge the effectiveness of the intervention? |
Internalisation:
Do all the stakeholders grasp the potential benefits and value of the intervention? |
Legitimation:
Do they believe it is appropriate for them to be involved in the intervention? |
Contextual integration:
Do local and national resources and policies support the implementation? |
Reconfiguration:
Will stakeholders be able to modify the intervention based on evaluation and experience? |
NPT, Normalisation Process Theory; RESTORE, REsearch into implementation STrategies to support patients of different ORigins and language background.