Table 2. GzLM Parameter Estimates of Main and Interactive Effects of Experimental Condition and Hostility Toward Women on Coercive Condom Use Resistance Tactics.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| B | Wald X² | Sig. | B | Wald X² | Sig. | B | Wald X² | Sig. | |
| Hostility Toward Women (HTW) | 0.11 | 41.16 | <.001 | 0.09 | 6.50 | <.05 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 0.50 |
| Insistent Condom Request | 0.04 | 0.93 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 0.53 |
| Indirect Condom Request | 0.11 | 7.51 | <.01 | 0.17 | 8.75 | <.01 | 0.16 | 7.59 | <.01 |
| Beverage Condition | 0.09 | 7.01 | <.01 | 0.14 | 5.45 | < .05 | 0.13 | 5.25 | < .05 |
| Insistent Condom Request × HTW | -0.02 | 0.24 | 0.62 | 0.06 | 0.79 | 0.37 | |||
| Indirect Condom Request × HTW | 0.04 | 0.88 | 0.35 | 0.13 | 5.27 | <.05 | |||
| Beverage Condition × Insistent Condom Request | -0.02 | 0.08 | 0.78 | -0.02 | 0.07 | 0.80 | |||
| Beverage Condition × Indirect Condom Request | -0.12 | 2.26 | 0.13 | -0.12 | 2.15 | 0.14 | |||
| Beverage Condition × HTW | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 5.11 | 0.14 | |||
| Beverage × HTW × Insistent Condom Request | -0.15 | 3.09 | 0.08 | ||||||
| Beverage × HTW × Indirect Condom Request | -0.19 | 5.33 | <.05 | ||||||
Note. For Beverage Condition 1 = alcohol condition, 0 = sober condition. For Condom Request Condition, the referent group was the direct condom request condition.