Table 4.
Authors | No of patients | Type of TET | No of patients | Cutoff value | Sensitivity, specificity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sasaki et al (1999)2 | 26 | Thymoma | 13 | 5.0 | 84.6%, 92.3% |
TC | 13 | ||||
Shibata et al (2009)6 | 40 | Thymoma | 37 | 6.3 | 100%, 92% |
TC | 3 | ||||
Inoue et al (2009)7 | 46 | Thymoma | 35 | 6.2 | 63.6%, 91.4% |
TC | 11 | ||||
Toba et al (2013)15 | 33 | Thymoma | 25 | 5.0 | 75%, 80% |
TC | 8 | ||||
Park et al (2016)16 | 61 | Thymoma | 54 | 5.1 | Not reported |
TC | 7 | ||||
Present study | 112 | Thymoma | 92 | 4.6a | 80.0%, 78.3% |
TC | 20 |
Note:
4.58 rounded off to the nearest tenth to 4.6.
Abbreviations: TET, thymic epithelial tumor; TC, thymic carcinoma.