Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 5;9:761–768. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S146522

Table 4.

Cutoff values for differentiating thymoma from thymic carcinoma in the literature

Authors No of patients Type of TET No of patients Cutoff value Sensitivity, specificity
Sasaki et al (1999)2 26 Thymoma 13 5.0 84.6%, 92.3%
TC 13
Shibata et al (2009)6 40 Thymoma 37 6.3 100%, 92%
TC 3
Inoue et al (2009)7 46 Thymoma 35 6.2 63.6%, 91.4%
TC 11
Toba et al (2013)15 33 Thymoma 25 5.0 75%, 80%
TC 8
Park et al (2016)16 61 Thymoma 54 5.1 Not reported
TC 7
Present study 112 Thymoma 92 4.6a 80.0%, 78.3%
TC 20

Note:

a

4.58 rounded off to the nearest tenth to 4.6.

Abbreviations: TET, thymic epithelial tumor; TC, thymic carcinoma.