Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 1;31(12):504–516. doi: 10.1089/apc.2017.0147

Table 6.

Independent Variables Associated with Clinician Intention to Prescribe Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Adult Patients Age 18 and Older: Results of Unadjusted and Adjusted Logistic Regression Models

Risk category Variablea Unadjusted OR (95% CI)b Adjusted OR (95% CI)c
MSM Lower knowledge about CDC PrEP guidance 1.61 (0.93–2.78)  
Transgender woman Lower knowledge about CDC PrEP guidance 1.67 (0.94–2.94)  
Heterosexual with multiple partners Nurse practitioner (vs. physician) 5.83 (1.56–21.87) 7.22 (1.68–30.93)
Older age for lower limit of age of patients in practice 0.92 (0.84–1.00) 0.90 (0.81–0.99)
Lower knowledge about CDC PrEP guidance 1.69 (1.01–2.86)  
More barriers related to cost and resource issues 2.19 (0.90–5.32)  
Heterosexual with HIV-infected partner Nurse practitioner (vs. physician) 7.73 (0.90–66.39) 11.61 (1.16–115.81)
Fewer barriers related to PrEP use in adolescents younger than 18 3.03 (0.96–9.09) 4.55 (1.08–20.00)
Lower endorsement of cost and insurance factors impacting clinician likelihood of prescribing PrEP 1.92 (0.93–4.00)  
Summary measure of all risk categories Lower knowledge about CDC PrEP guidance 1.82 (1.08–3.13) 1.82 (1.08–3.13)
Greater endorsement of cost and resource issues impacting prescription of PrEP 2.55 (1.01–6.43)  
Nurse practitioner (vs. physician) 3.33 (0.99–11.22)  
Older age for lower limit of age of patients in practice 0.93 (0.85–1.01)  
a

Variables in bold are significant in the adjusted model (p < 0.05).

b

ORs presented are significant at p < 0.10 and were entered into the adjusted logistic regression model. ORs and CIs in bold are significant at p < 0.05.

c

ORs in bold were significant in the adjusted model (p < 0.05). Nonsignificant variables were not included in the final model.

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CI, confidence interval; MSM, men who have sex with men; OR, odds ratio; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis.