Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;8(4):451–464. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1253

Table 1.

Meta‐analysis results using Royston‐Parmar models

Comparison FTE* Cochran's Q Global Non‐PH Test Schoenfeld Residuals
RT vs CTRT −0.215 (−0.336, −0.086) 12.71, 15 df, P=.625 χ 2=0.161, 1 df, P=.688 χ 2=25.64, 16 df, P=.059
RT vs CT+RT −0.191 (−0.375, −0.007) 20.69, 6 df, P=.002 χ 2=2.522, 1 df, P=.112 χ 2=10.34, 7 df, P=.170
⩽14 days
RT vs CT+RT 0.227 (0.073, 0.385) 12.34, 10 df, P=.263 χ 2=0.006, 1 df, P=.944 χ 2=7.65, 11 df, P=.744
>14 days
RT vs CT+S −0.447 (−0.654, ‐0.243) 8.85, 4 df, P=.065 χ 2=0.118, 1 df, P=.731 χ 2=8.65, 5 df, P=.124
CT+RT vs CT+S −0.444 (−0.830, −0.061) 0.01, 1 df, P=.939 χ 2=0.164, 1 df, P=.686 χ 2=0.49, 2 df, P=.783

Abbreviations: CTRT, chemoradiation; CT+RT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy; CT+S, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery; FTE, fixed treatment effect; RT, radiotherapy; PH, proportional hazard.* Values are log hazard ratios and 95% credible intervals.