Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 26;8(59):100150–100164. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22112

Table 5. The relationship between RAGE and HMGB1 genotypes and IS stratified by CISS classification in IS patients.

RAGE rs2070600 HMGB1 rs2249825
Genotype P value Allele P value Genotype P value Allele P value
CC CT TT C T CC CG GG C G
Controls 670 320 25 1660 370 689 295 31 1673 357
(66.0) (31.5) (2.5) (81.8) (18.2) (67.9) (29.1) (3.1) (82.4) (17.6)
Cases
LAA (n=653) 407 212 34 0.036 1026 280 0.088 460 182 11 0.279 1102 204 0.184
(62.3) (32.5) (5.2) (78.6) (21.4) (70.4) (27.9) (1.7) (84.4) (15.6)
PAD (n=262) 173 79 10 0.468 425 99 0.839 190 68 4 0.279 448 76 0.184
(66.0) (30.2) (3.8) (81.1) (18.9) (72.5) (26.0) (1.5) (85.5) (14.5
CS (n=46) 33 10 3 0.468 76 16 0.839 38 8 0 0.279 38 8 0.108
(71.7) (21.7) (6.5) (82.6) (17.4) (82.6) (17.4) (0.0) (82.6) (17.4)
UE (n=70) 40 25 5 0.262 105 35 0.839 46 24 0 0.708 116 24 0.894
(57.1) (35.7) (7.1) (75.0) (25.0) (65.7) (34.3) (0.0) (82.9) (17.1)

LAA: Large-artery atherosclerosis; PAD: Penetrating artery disease; CS: Cardioembolic Stroke; UE: Undetermined aetiology.