Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 8;8(59):100499–100507. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20037

Table 1. The main information of included studies in the meta-analysis.

Study Year Cancer type Total number Tumor stage Follow-up Therapy Detection Clinical Analysis NOS
I–II/III–IV (months) method outcomes
Zhang et al. [24] 2014 NSCLC 192 129/63 > 60 NA qRT-PCR OS, M 6
Iliev et al. [29] 2016 Bladder cancer 47 NA 42 ± 5 Surgery qRT-PCR OS U 7
Jiang et al. [26] 2016 ESCC 218 96/114 17 (12–72) Chemotherapy qRT-PCR OS M 7
Lin et al. [32] 2016 NSCLC 89 69/20 > 80 NA qRT-PCR OS U 6
Ma et al. [28] 2016 Osteosarcoma 76 64/12 44 (3–60) Surgery qRT-PCR OS,PFS M 7
Niu et al. [33] 2017 SCLC 33 16/17 NA NA qRT-PCR OS U 7
Sun et al. [25] 2016 Colorectal cancer 120 NA 36 (2–60) Surgery qRT-PCR OS U 7
Wang et al. [30] 2017 CCRCC 203 119/84 > 70 Surgery qRT-PCR OS M 6
Zhang et al. [18] 2016 Gastric cancer 100 57/43 > 60 Surgery qRT-PCR OS M 7

OS = overall survival; NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer; ESCC = esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; SCLC = small cell lung cancer; CCRCC = clear cell renal cell carcinoma; NA = not available; Multivariate: multivariate analysis; Univariate: univariate analysis; PFS = progression free survival; NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.