Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 11;8:2030. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02220-w

Table 1.

Phylogenetic generalised linear mixed models (PGLMM) testing the influence of parity mode and egg attendance on the occurrence of social grouping in squamate reptiles

Data set Parameter Estimate Test statistic
Parity mode
Conservative (n = 324) Intercept (β0) −2.01 ± 0.96 Z = −2.09, P = 0.04
Parity mode (β1) 2.34 ± 0.42 Z = 5.59, P < 0.001
Citation count <0.001 ± 0.001 Z = 0.27, P = 0.79
Signal in residuals (s2) 2.84 P < 0.001
Signal in response (s2) 4.19 P < 0.001
Relaxed (n = 1210) Intercept (β0) −3.25 ± 1.50 Z = −2.16, P = 0.03
Parity mode (β1) 2.82 ± 0.49 Z = 5.70, P < 0.001
Signal in residuals (s2) 7.28 P < 0.001
Signal in response (s2) 8.92 P < 0.001
Egg attendance (analyses restricted to oviparous species)
Conservative (n = 219) Intercept (β0) −1.61 ± 0.99 Z = 1.62, P = 0.11
Egg attendance (β1) −0.83 ± 0.54 Z = −1.52, P = 0.13
Citation count <0.001 ± 0.001 Z = −0.06, P = 0.95
Signal in residuals (s2) 2.66 P < 0.001
Signal in response (s2) 2.35 P < 0.001
Relaxed (n = 1049) Intercept (β0) −3.89 ± 1.51 Z = 2.58, P = 0.01
Egg attendance (β1) 1.04 ± 0.63 Z = 1.66, P = 0.10
Signal in residuals (s2) 7.07 P < 0.001
Signal in response (s2) 7.92 P < 0.001

N equals the number of species included in each analysis Significant terms are shown in bold The ‘signal in response (s2)’ parameter is derived from a model fit with no predictor variables and provides an estimate of phylogenetic structure of social grouping from each data set. Model estimates are reported ± SE. For confidence intervals of parameter estimates, see Supplementary Table 4. For a details on the conservative and relaxed data set, see Methods