Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 11;7:17294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17405-y

Figure 2.

Figure 2

‘Nebbiolo’ CVT 71 transcriptome assembly comparison with other cultivar transcripts and ‘Nebbiolo’-specific transcript functional annotation. Panels (a), (b) and (c) show Venn diagrams of ‘Nebbiolo’ transcript matching with PN40024 V1 and V2 annotations, Vitis vinifera ESTs and the cDNA full-length database; ‘Tannat’ and ‘Corvina’ assembled transcriptomes, separated by aligning to the reference but not matching a known annotation (novel); or those assembled transcriptomes not aligning on the genome and with alignment rejected as failing quality control, respectively. Panels (d), (e) and (f) represent the same categories but with the distribution of GO terms for the putative ‘Nebbiolo’-specific transcripts.