Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 27;10(22):4479–4490. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201701582

Table 2.

Electrocatalytic activity of LiMn2O4–carbon composite electrodes.

Metric j E [V versus RHE][a] j at 1.68 V versus RHE[a]
disk area 10 mA cm-2disk 1.749(2) 2.1(1) mA cm-2disk
mass 10 A g−1 1.705(3) 5.3(4) A g−1
oxide area 100 μA cm-2ox 1.714(3) 42(3) μA cm−2 ox
TOF‐s[b] 0.07(1) O2 Mn−1 s−1
TOF‐b[c] 0.0025(2) O2 Mn−1 s−1

[a] Uncertainties indicate the propagated standard deviation (1σ) of 3 electrodes per pH value. [b] Turnover frequency assuming that all Mn on the oxide surface are active. [c] Turnover frequency assuming that all Mn on the electrode is active; evaluation based on the capacitance‐corrected disk current during the 5th cycle of all investigated pH values; the oxide loading was 50(1) μg with an oxide surface area of 6.1(2) cm2.