Table 3.
T0 | T1 | T2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary outcomes | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Cohen’s da | Intervention | Control | Cohen’s d |
Quality of life | 4.08 (.70) N = 152 |
3.93 (.67) N = 110 |
4.15 (.66) N = 124 |
3.89 (.70) N = 88 |
.0.373 t(210) = 2.71 p = .01 |
4.57 (.95) N = 104 |
4.53 (.75) N = 76 |
0.051 t(178) = .33 p = .74 |
Social functioning | 112.13 (24.76) N = 152 |
109.57 (23.21) N = 111 |
107.86 (26.92) N = 125 |
108.57 (23.89) N = 89 |
−.028 t(212) = −.20 p = .84 |
111.78 (22.93) N = 104 |
115.87 (24.96) N = 76 |
−.170 t(178) = −1.14 p = .26 |
Personal recovery | 3.52 (.55) N = 152 |
3.41 (.48) N = 110 |
3.55 (.44) N = 125 |
3.44 (.57) N = 89 |
.212 t(212) = 1.59 p = .11 |
3.58 (.46) N = 104 |
3.46 (.51) N = 76 |
.259 t(178) = 1.74 p = .08 |
Secondary outcomes | ||||||||
Hope | 2.91 (.38) N = 152 |
2.84 (.38) N = 110 |
2.89 (.34) N = 123 |
2.84 (.39) N = 89 |
.148 t(210) = 1.09 p = .28 |
2.92 (.35) N = 103 |
2.87 (.36) N = 75 |
.143 t(176) = .95 p = .35 |
Empowerment | 3.64 (.48) N = 139 |
3.60 (.49) N = 103 |
3.67 (.39) N = 111 |
3.57 (.54) N = 82 |
.215 t(141) = 1.42 p = .16 |
3.67 (.41) N = 99 |
3.67 (.49) N = 73 |
.070 t(170) = .44 p = .66 |
Self-efficacy | 4.41 (.91) N = 139 |
4.36 (.76) N = 101 |
4.51 (0.62) N = 112 |
4.35 (.81) N = 81 |
.227 t(144) = 1.59 p = .14 |
4.43 (.73) N = 97 |
4.42 (.73) N = 70 |
.004 t(165) = .03 p = .98 |
Unmet needs | 3.95 (3.16) N = 149 |
4.45 (2.83) N = 106 |
3.16 (2.3) N = 117 |
4.0 (3.04) N = 89 |
.316 t(159) = −2.14 (P = .03) |
2.18 (2.31) N = 101 |
2.85 (.79) N = 72 |
.252 t(171) = −1.72 p = .09 |
aCohen’s d corresponds to the difference in change scores from baseline between the intervention and control group. Cohen’s d is positive if it is in the expected direction