Table 4.

Mixed modeling analysis testing the effect of the CARe methodology on primary outcomes

	Quality of life			Personal recovery				Social functioning
ICC teama	.030			.007				.284
ICC participants	.602			.652				.673
Model	Test	P	95%CI	Test	P	95%CI		Test	P	95%CI
Time	F = 22.37	.00		F = 2.87	.06			F = 2.05	.13
T1	B = .04	.45	−.07–.15	B = .03	.44	−.04–.10		B = .38	.80	−2.53-3.30
T2	B = .51	.00	.35–.66	B = .12	.02	.02–.22		B = 4.22	.05.	.01–8.42
Intervention	B = .06	.52	−.14–.27	B = .09	.10	−.02–.20		B = 4.67	.07	−.32–9.66
Intervention x timeb	Χ2 = 4.46	.11		Χ2 = 1.28	.53			Χ2 = 4.64	.10
Covariatesc
Age	B = .00	.18	.00–.01	B = .00	.92	−.00–.00	B = −.96	.00	−1.13--.78
Gender	B = .08	.31	−.08–.25	B = −.08	.17	−.20–.03	B = 5.23	.05	−.07–10.53
Partner	B = .06	.51	−.11–.22	B = .09	.12	−.02–.21	B = 5.4	.03	.50–10.37
Symptoms	B = −.55	.00	−.66--.44	B = −.31	.00	−.39--.24	B = −9.72	.00	−13.06—6.39
Amount of support	B = −.01	.79	−.09–.07	B = −.01	.64	−.07–.04	B = 4.70	.00	2.29–7.11
Recovery knowledge team	B = −.20	.29	−.58–.17	B = −.10	.44	−.34–.15	B = −11.28	.03	−21.64--.93
Recovery promoting relationship	B = .33	.00	.21–.44	B = .24	.00	.16–.32	B = 4.71	.01	1.22–8.19

^aIntra-Class Correlation for team and participants

^bEffect of the intervention. The chi-square values are values of the deviance or likelihood ratio test

^cThe effects of the included covariates