Table 5.

Mixed modeling analysis testing the effect of the CARe methodology on secondary outcomes

	Hope			Empowerment			Self-efficacy			Unmet Needs
ICC teama	.03			.00			.01			.03
ICC participants	.59			.57			.67			.48
	Test	P	95% CI	Test	P	95% CI	Test	P	95% CI	Test	P	95% CI
Time	F = 1.80	.16		F = 1.51	.23		F = .32	.73		F = 10.07	.00
T1	B = .00	.96	−.06–.06		.14	−.12–.02		.45	−.07–.15		.24	−.82–.21
T2	B = −08	07	.00–.16	B = −.05	.70	−.08–.11	B = .04	.99	−.16–.16	B = −.31	.00	−2.34- -.91
Intervention	B = .03	.49	−.07–.13	B = .02	.96	−.09–.09	B = .00	.98	−.17–.18	B = −1.63	.65	−.69–.43
Intervention x timeb	Χ2 = .22	.90		Χ2 = 1.99	.37		Χ2 = 3.63	.16		Χ2 = .73	.70
Covariatesc
Age	B = −.00	.80	.00–.00	B = .00	.07	−.00–.01	B = .00	.85	−.01–.01	B = −.01	.19	−.03–.01
Gender	B = −.13	.00	−.22--.04	B = −.13	.01	−.23--.03	B = −.30	.00	−.48--.11	B = −.48	.11	−1.08–.12
Partner	B = .09	.05	.001–.18	B = .02	.72	−.08–.12	B = .16	.09	−.03–.34	B = −.12	.74	−.83–.59
Symptoms	B = −.23	.00	−.29--.17	B = −.31	.00	−.38---.24	B = −.70	.00	−.82--.58	B = 2.48	.00	2.04–2.90
Amount of support	B = −.03	.21	−.07–.02	B = −.01	.65	−.06–.04	B = .00	.93	−.08–.09	B = −.09	.56	−.41–.23
Recovery knowledge team	B = −.02	.84	−.22–.18	B = .01	.95	−.22–.23	B = −.29	.14	−.68–.09	B = −1.09	.18	−2.66-.49
Recovery promoting relationship	B = .15	.00	.09–.21	B = .38	.00	.32–.45	B = .29	.00	.16–.42	B = −.49	.03	−.94--.04

^aIntra-Class Correlation for team and participants

^bEffect of the intervention. The chi-square values are values of the deviance or likelihood ratio test

^cThe effects of the included covariates