Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 11;17:246. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1070-5

Table 2.

Estimation results of the validity of the HAM-Nat by four different methods

Correction Method Validity of HAM-Nat (r^yx1a)
Thorndike’s case A .56
Thorndike’s case C .59
Expectation maximization (EM) .60
Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) .59