Table 5. Accuracy of main prediction methods in analyses of height in an African cohort.
Model | Weights associated to each predictor | Adjusted R2 | P-value for improvement over simpler model | |
---|---|---|---|---|
European PRS | African PRS | |||
EUR | 0.164 | 0.02618 | <10-11 | |
AFR | 0.106 | 0.01074 | <10-5 | |
AFR+ANC | 0.124 | 0.01331 | 0.01 | |
EUR+AFR | 0.155 | 0.092 | 0.03397 | <10-3 |
EUR+AFR+ANC | 0.150 | 0.102 | 0.03443 | 0.17 |
EUR-AFR-meta | 0.151 | 0.027 | 0.03158 | NA |
We report adjusted R2 on the observed scale for each of the 5 main prediction methods, as well as EUR-AFR-meta. P-values are from likelihood ratio tests comparing models EUR and AFR to the null model, model AFR+ANC to AFR, model EUR+AFR to EUR, and EUR+LAT+ANC to EUR+AFR. For the EUR model we used RLD2=0.2 and PT=10-3, for AFR we used RLD2=0.8 and PT=0.05 and for EUR-AFR-meta we used RLD2=0.2and PT=10-6. We also report normalized weights, defined as the mixing weight (see Methods) multiplied by the standard deviation of the PRS.