Table 5.

Comparison of Frequency of Discussion of Behavioral Responses to Cultural Antinomy of Sex and Schooling Across Interview Sub-samples

	Student Interviews			Teacher Interviews
	All	Female	Male	All	Female	Male
Discusses teachers suspending or punishing students for relationships	74%	83%	61%	92%	100%	89%
[Students] report personal experience of teacher punishment for relationships1	42%	50%	27%	---	---	---
[Teachers] describe punishing students before detecting evidence of academic or behavioral changes1	---	---	---	79%	75%	81%
[Teachers] describe punishing a high-performing student who was caught in a relationship1	---	---	---	75%	63%	81%
[Teachers] use language of female vulnerability and/or need to protect girls when discussing punishments1	---	---	---	54%	50%	56%
Discusses parents or relatives withdrawing financial support for schooling due to student relationship.	67%	71%	61%	58%	63%	56%
[Students] report personal experience of relatives withdrawing support	21%	38%	0%	---	---	---
[Teachers] describe parents as allies in regulating students’ sexual behavior.	---	---	---	65%	75%	61%
[Teachers] describe specific example of a parent intervening due to a relationship	---	---	---	73%	80%	70%
Students discuss relationships as a socially codified way to leave school	43%	58%	22%	---	---	---
Reporting personal experience2	28%	36%	0%	---	---	---
Reporting experience of others2	72%	64%	100%	---	---	---
N	42	24	18	26	8	18

Notes: Shaded cells indicate significant differences between male and female interview respondents (p<0.05).

Unless otherwise specified, denominator for all rows is limited to those who discussed the antinomy between sex and schooling in their interviews (See Table 3).

¹Denominator limited to respondents who discussed teacher punishment (first row of table).

²Denominator limited to respondents who explicitly discussed relationships as socially codified way to leave school (tenth row of table).