Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Immunity. 2017 Nov 21;47(5):862–874.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.10.020

Table 1.

Summary of cell migratory responses divided by chemokine type (intermediate vs. end agonist), cell type (BMDCs and neutrophils, WT and GRK3-deficient), chemoattractant (CCL19, CXCL12, C5a), and source input (stable v. continuous rise, homogeneous, presoak v. immediate).

Chemokine Cell Type Migratory Persistence Up Spatial Gradient Directional Path of Early Migration Directional Path of Persistent Migration
Stable Cont. Rise Homogenous Presoak Immediate
CCL19 Mature DCs WT None
(Fig 1)
Directed
(Fig 2)
Random
(S. Fig 12)
Random
(Fig 5)
Up Spatial Gradient
(Fig 5)
CCL19 Mature DCs Grk3−/− Directed
(Fig 3)
Directed
(Fig 3)
Random
(Fig 6)
Up Spatial Gradient
(Fig 6)
CXCL12 Mature DCs WT None
(Fig 4)
Directed
(Fig 4)
CXCL12 Neutrophils WT None
(Fig 4)
Directed
(Fig 4)
Random
(S. Fig 12)
Random
(Fig 5)
Up Spatial Gradient
(Fig 5)
CXCL12 Neutrophils Grk3−/− Random
(Fig 6)
Up Spatial Gradient
(Fig 6)
C5a Immature DCs WT Directed
(Fig 4)
Directed
(Fig 4)
C5a Neutrophils WT Directed
(Fig 4)
Directed
(Fig 4)
Random
(S. Fig 12)
Up Spatial Gradient
(Fig 5)
Up Spatial Gradient
(Fig 5)