Table 3.
Sample | Source of Variance | Relative Standard Deviation (%) |
---|---|---|
Control | Analyst-to-analyst | 1 |
Day-to-day within Analyst | 1 | |
Instrument-to-instrument within daya | 2 | |
Overall | 3 | |
70% of Target | Analyst-to-analyst | 0 |
Day-to-day within Analyst | 0 | |
Instrument-to-instrument within daya | 3 | |
Overall | 3 | |
85% of Target | Analyst-to-analyst | 0 |
Day-to-day within Analyst | 1 | |
Instrument-to-instrument within daya | 2 | |
Overall | 3 | |
100% of Target | Analyst-to-analyst | 0 |
Day-to-day within Analyst | 2 | |
Instrument-to-instrument within daya | 2 | |
Overall | 3 | |
115% of Target | Analyst-to-analyst | 0 |
Day-to-day within Analyst | 1 | |
Instrument-to-instrument within daya | 2 | |
Overall | 2 | |
130% of Target | Analyst-to-analyst | 0 |
Day-to-day within Analyst | 2 | |
Instrument-to-instrument within daya | 3 | |
Overall | 4 |
The analysis was based on the data generated in the recovery study (Table 1) with three analysts, 2 instruments over 8 independent assays (one assay per day). Variance component analysis was performed to estimate the variance contributed by each factor.
Instrument-to-instrument variance contains the variance of sample preparation.