Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 29;8:630. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00630

Table 4.

Multiple comparisons of the relative HARM incidence according to stroke subtypes.

LAA vs. SVO LAA vs. CE LAA vs. SOD LAA vs. SUD SVO vs. CE SVO vs. SOD SVO vs. SUD CE vs. SOD CE vs. SUD SOD vs. SUD
p-Value 0.011* 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.016** 0.366 0.001*** 1.000 1.000 1.000

HARM, hyperintense acute reperfusion marker; LAA, large artery atherosclerosis; SVO, small vessel occlusion; CE, cardioembolism; SOD, strokes of other determined etiology; SUD, strokes of undetermined etiology.

Table shows the relative HARM incidence was significantly different between the LAA and SVO (p = 0.001), SVO and CE (p = 0.016), and SVO and SUD (p = 0.001) subgroups.