Table 1. Performance (percentage accuracy) of PLncPRO on different plant test data sets.
| Model used | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant species | At | Gm | Vv | St | Os | Zm | Amt | Pp | Sm | Cr |
| A. thaliana (At) | 95.70 | 94.54 | 93.72 | 91.36 | 89.72 | 93.72 | 62.61 | 92.03 | 84.69 | 54.05 |
| G. max (Gm) | 91.52 | 92.30 | 91.22 | 86.44 | 83.75 | 92.02 | 61.55 | 89.88 | 82.36 | 53.58 |
| V. vinifera (Vv) | 93.03 | 92.62 | 93.64 | 86.34 | 87.15 | 92.35 | 66.94 | 90.79 | 85.93 | 56.89 |
| S. tuberosum (St) | 73.98 | 74.07 | 74.13 | 83.05 | 74.51 | 74.69 | 67.48 | 72.13 | 72.03 | 50.48 |
| O. sativa (Os) | 87.41 | 88.79 | 90.09 | 86.07 | 93.93 | 88.45 | 81.30 | 84.32 | 83.36 | 71.05 |
| Z. mays (Zm) | 86.09 | 88.62 | 86.61 | 85.24 | 88.49 | 91.22 | 80.95 | 87.06 | 76.66 | 66.55 |
| A. trichopoda (Amt) | 70.20 | 75.43 | 75.82 | 89.11 | 88.62 | 77.81 | 97.92 | 73.71 | 75.56 | 64.48 |
| P. patens (Pp) | 87.26 | 86.55 | 87.84 | 83.03 | 79.76 | 87.53 | 62.58 | 90.74 | 74.86 | 60.73 |
| S. moellendorffii (Sm) | 85.22 | 87.63 | 86.53 | 72.91 | 88.57 | 82.52 | 74.70 | 74.04 | 93.70 | 74.70 |
| C. reinhardtii (Cr) | 75.49 | 74.42 | 75.37 | 56.21 | 73.76 | 67.66 | 54.28 | 74.25 | 80.31 | 96.78 |
Prediction accuracy using the model of same species is highlighted in bold.