Table 2. Performance comparison (percentage accuracy) of PLncPRO with existing tools on different plant data sets.
| Plant species | PLEK | CPAT | CNCI | CPC | PLncPRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. thaliana | 87.92 | 91.27 | 89.11 | 86.33 | 95.70 |
| G. max | 83.27 | 82.58 | 85.13 | 83.11 | 92.30 |
| V. vinifera | 85.62 | 85.45 | 86.08 | 88.06 | 93.64 |
| S. tuberosum | 74.85 | 76.06 | 81.87 | 60.52 | 83.05 |
| O. sativa | 87.24 | 89.81 | 94.11 | 83.78 | 93.93 |
| Z. mays | 84.10 | 80.93 | 82.18 | 77.88 | 91.22 |
| A. trichopoda | 88.72 | 97.53 | 83.36 | 58.51 | 97.92 |
| P. patens | 78.71 | 72.14 | 84.82 | 76.00 | 90.74 |
| S. moellendorffii | 86.94 | 87.47 | 95.08 | 83.90 | 93.70 |
| C. reinhardtii | 88.13 | 72.32 | 96.41 | 80.10 | 96.78 |
The highest accuracy achieved for each species is highlighted in bold.