Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 3;1(18):1414–1422. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017007898

Table 3.

Summary of discordance between WES and SNP methods designated by nucleotide position in cDNA and RH exon that were resolved by Sanger re-sequencing

Reason cDNA position Exon WES SNP array Sanger re-sequence Sample UPIDs
RHCE nucleotide assigned to RHD by WES RHD c.186G>T 2 G/T G/G G/G 10
RHD c.602C>G 4 C/G G/G G/G 60
RHD c.667T>G 5 T/G G/G G/G 60
RHD c.697G>C 5 G/C G/G G/G 84
RHD nucleotide assigned to RHCE by WES RHCE c.410C>T 3 C/T C/C C/C 7, 50, 82
RHCE c.654G>C 5 G/C G/G G/G 39
RHCE c.916A>G 6 A/G A/A A/A 67, 104
Misassignment as a result of reference sequence RHCE c.48G>C 1 G/C G/G G/G 33, 81, 124
RHCE c.48G>C 1 C/C G/C G/C 38, 85
WES detects changes not included in SNP testing RHD c.916G>A 6 G/A NT G/A 28, 81
RHCE c.941T>C 7 T/C NT T/C 89, 102

NT, not tested.