Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jan;39(1):29–36. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001620

Table 2. Articles Included in Meta-analysis of Correlations.

Article Level of Evidence Speech Recognition Measure Cohort Age Mean ± SD (Range) Male %/Female % Follow-Up Time (Months)
Calvino 201527 4 NS 52.8 ± 14.0 45 / 55 ≥ 6
Damen 20076 3 Words in Quiet: Antwerp-Nijmegen, NVA 49.6 ± 10.9 54/46 ≥ 12
Francis 20029 4 Words in Quiet: NS
Sentences in Quiet: CID
63.4 ± 8.6 (50 - 80) NA ≥ 6
Hirschfelder 200831 4 Words in Quiet: Freiburg monosyllables
Sentences in Noise: HSM Noise
50.2 ± 14.4 (21 - 72) 36/64 ≥ 12
Knutson 199826 4 Words in Quiet: NU-6
Sentences in Quiet: Iowa Sentence Test
51.8 ± 14.3 (24 - 70) 46/54 54
Kumar 20167 4 Sentences in Quiet: BKB/CUNY 36.8 (18 – 68) NA 12
Sanchez-Cuadrado 201528 4 NS 60 (24-85) 46/54 ≥ 6
Vermeire 200530 4 Words in Quiet: NVA 58 NA ≥ 4
Vermeire 200629 4 Words in Quiet: NVA 62 (40-78) NA ≥ 3

Articles satisfying inclusion criteria for meta-analysis of correlations. Level of evidence, speech recognition measure used; patient age (mean, standard deviation, and range); male/female percentages; and follow-up time in months. NS: Not Specified; CID: Central Institute for the Deaf; NVA: Dutch Audiological Society; HSM - Hochmair Schulz Moser; NU-6: Northwestern University Auditory Test Number Six; CUNY: City University of New York; BKB: Bamford-Kowal-Bench.