Table 3.
Unadjusted (n 88 714) | Adjusted (n 70 177) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | |
Low-fat diet | ||||
Q1 (high adherence) | 0·86 | 0·82, 0·91 | 1·43 | 1·33, 1·54 |
Q2 | 0·77 | 0·73, 0·81 | 1·14 | 1·06, 1·22 |
Q3 | 0·79 | 0·74, 0·84 | 1·05 | 0·97, 1·13 |
Q5 | 0·83 | 0·78, 0·89 | 0·99 | 0·93, 1·07 |
Q5 (low adherence) | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. |
Ptrend† | <0·001 | <0·001 | ||
Reduced-carbohydrate diet | ||||
Q1 (high adherence) | 1·05 | 1·00, 1·11 | 0·71 | 0·66, 0·76 |
Q2 | 0·92 | 0·88, 0·97 | 0·71 | 0·67, 0·76 |
Q3 | 0·89 | 0·85, 0·93 | 0·77 | 0·73, 0·82 |
Q5 | 0·91 | 0·87, 0·95 | 0·84 | 0·80, 0·88 |
Q5 (low adherence) | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. |
Ptrend† | 0·516 | <0·001 | ||
Mediterranean-style diet | ||||
Q1 (low adherence) | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. |
Q2 | 0·89 | 0·85, 0·93 | 0·99 | 0·94, 1·05 |
Q3 | 0·85 | 0·81, 0·89 | 1·01 | 0·96, 1·07 |
Q5 | 0·78 | 0·74, 0·82 | 1·00 | 0·94, 1·07 |
Q5 (high adherence) | 0·68 | 0·64, 0·73 | 0·95 | 0·88, 1·03 |
Ptrend† | <0·001 | 0·513 | ||
DGA diet | ||||
Q1 (low adherence) | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. |
Q2 | 0·89 | 0·84, 0·94 | 1·04 | 0·97, 1·11 |
Q3 | 0·82 | 0·78, 0·87 | 1·07 | 1·00, 1·14 |
Q5 | 0·80 | 0·76, 0·84 | 1·14 | 1·07, 1·22 |
Q5 (high adherence) | 0·77 | 0·73, 0·81 | 1·24 | 1·15, 1·33 |
Ptrend† | <0·001 | <0·001 |
Ref., referent values.
All adjusted models controlled for baseline total energy intake (continuous), diet pattern at year 3 of follow-up, age (continuous), baseline total mild, moderate and hard physical activity as metabolic equivalents of task-h/week, race/ethnicity, annual family income and baseline smoking status. All categorical variables (race/ethnicity, annual family income and baseline smoking status) were modeled using disjoint indicator variables.
Ptrend corresponds to a Wald test statistic when a linear term for quintile of diet pattern was substituted in the model.