Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Nutr. 2017 May 16;117(8):1189–1197. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517000952

Table 4.

Relative odds of weight gain (≥10 % from baseline weight vs. <10 %) by baseline weight status and quintile (Q) of adherence to a low-fat, reduced-carbohydrate, Mediterranean-style or Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) diet pattern in postmenopausal women who participated in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study* (Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

Normal weight Overweight Obese class I Obese class II Obese class III





OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI
Low-fat diet
 Q1 (high adherence) 1·28 1·13, 1·46 1·60 1·40, 1·83 1·73 1·43, 2·09 1·44 1·08, 1·92 1·09 0·72, 1·65
 Q2 1·02 0·90, 1·15 1·22 1·07, 1·39 1·34 1·12, 1·59 1·35 1·04, 1·75 0·93 0·64, 1·35
 Q3 0·94 0·82, 1·07 1·19 1·04, 1·36 1·23 1·02, 1·48 1·07 0·81, 1·40 0·81 0·56, 1·17
 Q5 0·89 0·78, 1·02 1·09 0·95, 1·25 1·10 0·92, 1·31 1·06 0·82, 1·39 0·76 0·53, 1·09
 Q5 (low adherence) 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
  Ptrend <0·001 <0·001 <0·001 0·005 0·727
Reduced-carbohydrate diet
 Q1 (high adherence) 0·72 0·63, 0·81 0·67 0·59, 0·76 0·63 0·53, 0·76 0·79 0·60, 1·05 0·97 0·65, 1·46
 Q2 0·72 0·65, 0·81 0·73 0·65, 0·82 0·59 0·49, 0·70 0·83 0·63, 1·11 0·65 0·43, 0·99
 Q3 0·75 0·68, 0·83 0·74 0·66, 0·82 0·78 0·67, 0·91 1·05 0·81, 1·37 0·99 0·66, 1·49
 Q5 0·82 0·76, 0·89 0·81 0·74, 0·89 0·86 0·75, 0·99 1·05 0·83, 1·33 0·98 0·67, 1·43
 Q5 (low adherence) 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
  Ptrend <0·001 <0·001 <0·001 0·040 0·416
Mediterranean-style diet
 Q1 (low adherence) 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
 Q2 0·91 0·83, 0·99 1·02 0·93, 1·12 1·06 0·93, 1·22 1·16 0·94, 1·43 0·79 0·57, 1·10
 Q3 0·99 0·90, 1·08 0·98 0·89, 1·08 1·05 0·90, 1·21 1·11 0·88, 1·41 1·19 0·85, 1·67
 Q4 0·93 0·84, 1·03 1·05 0·94, 1·18 1·09 0·92, 1·29 0·92 0·69, 1·25 1·12 0·73, 1·72
 Q5 (high adherence) 0·90 0·80, 1·01 0·95 0·83, 1·09 1·15 0·93, 1·42 0·86 0·60, 1·23 1·08 0·61, 1·90
  Ptrend 0·159 0·831 0·206 0·531 0·403
DGA diet
 Q1 (low adherence) 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref. 1·00 Ref.
 Q2 0·99 0·88, 1·12 1·06 0·94, 1·20 1·01 0·86, 1·19 1·09 0·86, 1·38 1·04 0·75, 1·46
 Q3 1·00 0·89, 1·13 1·13 1·00, 1·28 1·04 0·88, 1·23 1·09 0·84, 1·41 1·65 1·15, 2·36
 Q4 1·10 0·98, 1·24 1·15 1·02, 1·30 1·28 1·08, 1·52 1·12 0·84, 1·49 1·09 0·73, 1·65
 Q5 (high adherence) 1·13 1·00, 1·28 1·30 1·15, 1·48 1·41 1·17, 1·70 1·33 0·99, 1·80 1·86 1·18, 2·95
  Ptrend 0·005 <0·001 <0·001 0·096 0·019

Ref., referent values.

*

Adjusted models included age (continuous) at baseline, alcohol intake at baseline, race/ethnicity, annual family income, physical activity at baseline (continuous), smoking status at baseline and energy intake (continuous) at baseline. All non-continuous variables were modeled using disjoint indicator variables.

Ptrend corresponds to a Wald test statistic when a linear term for quintile of diet pattern was substituted in the model.