Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Jun 14;13(7):3398–3412. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00382

Table IV.

MMPBSA binding affinities (kcal/mol)in comparison with experiment (IC50). The slab membrane geometry (the thickness and z-centerin Å) compiled from the explicit solvent MD simulation are also shown for each complex.

Name RTln(IC50) mthick mcenter MMPBSA (INP=1) MMPBSA (INP=2)
Amitriptyline -7.08 36.086 -10.383 -38.23 -9.84
Perhexline (PE0) -7.23 36.661 -1.620 -40.73 -12.44
Perhexline (PE1) -7.23 36.473 -5.681 -41.96 -13.63
Mizolastine -9.15 36.260 1.360 -61.25 -24.59
Loratadine -9.58 36.126 -0.969 -52.48 -18.64
Domperidone -9.62 35.979 0.707 -59.53 -20.69
Terfenadine (TE0) -9.82 36.616 -2.319 -69.67 -29.00
Terfenadine (TE1) -9.82 37.216 -0.611 -72.91 -30.56
droperidol -10.61 36.459 3.308 -59.04 -24.78
Pimozide -10.97 36.910 0.190 -60.04 -20.09
Sertindole -11.13 36.438 -1.161 -62.91 -23.89
Astemizole -12.81 34.133 -0.043 -67.64 -26.21