. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 13.

Published in final edited form as: Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2016 Jul 8;7(8):828–836. doi: 10.1177/1948550616657599

Table 5.

Income predicting DRM positive affect and negative affect composites.

Measurement Occasion	Outcome
	DRM Positive Affect			DRM Negative Affect
	β	95% CI		β	95% CI
	β	LB	UB	β	LB	UB
2012	0.02	−0.03	0.06	−0.02	−0.08	0.02
2013	0.02	−0.02	0.06	0.01	−0.03	0.05
2014	0.04	−0.01	0.09	0.04	−0.01	0.09
All, between-persons^*	0.02	−0.02	0.05	−0.02	−0.04	0.03
All, within-persons^*	0.05	−0.02	0.11	0.05	−0.02	0.12

Note: DRM = day reconstruction method; CI = confidence interval; LB = lower-bound; UB = upper-bound; 95% CIs for parameter estimates in boldface do not include zero.

These parameters were estimated using multilevel models, and represent the between-persons and within-persons effects across all three waves of data.