Table 3.
Question | ALL users (13) | FEATURE and RF NON-experts (4) | FEATURE experts and RF NON-experts (3) | FEATURE NON-experts and RF experts (2) | FEATURE and RF experts (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate your increase in confidence of RF classification of FEATURE data after using RFEX summaries | 2.7 (SD 2.2) | 2.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 4.5 |
Estimate your increase in understanding why and how RF works on FEATURE data (e.g. RF Explainability) using RFEX one page summaries | 3.3 (SD 1.7) | 3.25 | 3.7 | 1 | 4.25 |
I believe RFEX approach will be useful for other applications of RF | 4.4 (SD 0.5) | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4 | 4.5 |
I believe RFEX approach (or its modifications) will be useful for other machine learning methods | 4.0 (SD 0.8) | 4.5 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 4.25 |