Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016 Nov 24;21(6):1711–1718. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2632621

TABLE I.

Comparison between the UEM and proposed method

Method TP (valid weight) TP (invalid weight) Multi (combined weight) FN FP
UEM Method 2991 (12.4%) 10438 (43.3%) 68 (0.3%) 10604 (44.0%) 26630
Our Method 9318 (38.7%) 0 3433 (14.2%) 11350 (47.1%) 2840