Table 1.
Criteria | Include if | Exclude if | |
---|---|---|---|
Phase 1/title and abstract screening | 1) The study assesses a primary outcome measure of interest. | Study reports on human antimicrobial use, including consumption, prescribing, dosing, and sales of an antibiotic, antiviral, antiparasitic, or antifungal drug. | Study does not report on antimicrobial use or only reports on antimicrobial use in animals or agriculture. |
2) The study quantitatively evaluates the effect of an intervention. | Study is a quantitative impact evaluation. | Study is a qualitative study, editorial, commentary, review, or synthesis or does not evaluate the impact of an intervention. | |
3) A policy intervention is evaluated. | A policy intervention using education, persuasion, incentivization, coercion, training, restriction, changing the physical or social context, modeling appropriate behavior, or reducing barriers to action is being evaluated. | Intervention was not a change to a policy (e.g., clinical study). | |
Phase 2/full-text screening | 1) The study assesses a primary outcome measure of interest. | Study reports on human antimicrobial use, including consumption, prescribing, dosing, and sales of an antibiotic, antiviral, antiparasitic, or antifungal drug. | Study does not report on antimicrobial use or only reports on antimicrobial use in animals or agriculture. |
2) The study quantitatively evaluates the effect of an intervention. | Study is a quantitative impact evaluation. | Study is a qualitative study, editorial, commentary, review, or synthesis or does not evaluate the impact of an intervention. | |
3) The study reports on a policy intervention enacted at the government level. | The policy intervention was enacted by a government or government agency at the federal, state, provincial, or municipal level. | Intervention was not enacted by a government (e.g., intervention was enacted in a single hospital or network of hospitals). | |
4) The intervention is clearly described | The study provides a description that includes the intervention’s aim, enacting government authority, timing, and form. | The study does not describe the aim, governing body, timing of the intervention, or form of the intervention. | |
Effectiveness review only: 5) The study design is sufficiently rigorous to meet the minimum methodological requirements of the Cochrane Collaboration’s EPOC group |
Effectiveness review only: Study design is experimental or quasi-experimental, such as randomized controlled trial, interrupted time series, and controlled before/after study, or it can be re-analyzed to meet this standard. | Effectiveness review only: Study does not have a control group or use pre-intervention data and cannot be re-analyzed. |