Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;17:40. doi: 10.1186/s12898-017-0152-x

Table 1.

Comparison of Kaplan–Meier survival curves for each pair of M. tuberculata populations, in all treatments including controls

Population 1 Population 2 High temperature Low temperature High salinity level Control
Majrase Ein Kaftor 0.1748 0.0009 0.0004 < 1e−04
Majrase Nofarim 0.0014 < 1e−04 0.0032 < 1e−04
Majrase Sapir 0.0014 0.0011 < 1e−04 < 1e−04
Majrase Timna 0.0064 0.001 < 1e−04 < 1e−04
Ein Kaftor Nofarim 0.0041 0.0015* 0.5272 0.1649
Ein Kaftor Sapir < 1e−04 0.5767 0.7197 0.9689
Ein Kaftor Timna < 1e−04 0.9046 0.2714 0.16
Nofarim Sapir < 1e−04 0.0002* 0.3259 0.1697
Nofarim Timna < 1e−04 0.0027* 0.0909 0.9904
Sapir Timna 0.8041 0.6424 0.4429 0.1658
Majrase Majrase control < 1e−04 0.019* 0.9809
Ein Kaftor Ein Kaftor control < 1e−04 < 1e−04 0.4248
Nofarim Nofarim control < 1e−04 < 1e−04 0.0112
Sapir Sapir control < 1e−04 < 1e−04 0.6581
Timna Timna control < 1e−04 < 1e−04 0.2945

We carried out the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) and Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon tests. Significant log-rank P values are marked in italic and significant Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon P values are marked with an asterisk