Table 4.
Sensitivity analysis of the prospective associations between adherence to the Healthy Dietary Adherence Score (divided into quartiles) at baseline and indicators of psychosocial well-being at follow-up (N = 7196)
| KINDL® | SDQ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better self-esteem | Good parent relations | No detectable emotional problems | No detectable peer problems | |||||
| HDAS† | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI |
| Q4 (>28) | 1.2 | 1.0–1.5 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.5 | 1.4 | 1.2–1.6 | 1.3 | 1.1–1.6 |
| Q3 (21–27) | 1.2 | 1.0–1.4 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1–1.5 | 1.3 | 1.1–1.4 |
| Q2 (16–20) | 0.9 | 0.8–1.1 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1–1.4 | 1.0 | 0.9–1.2 |
| Q1 (<15) | reference | reference | reference | reference | ||||
OR and CI obtained using a multilevel model correcting for cluster design (country)
Model adjusted for: age, sex, BMI z-score, well-being at baseline, and highest parental education and income
†HDAS ranges from 0 to 49
HDAS Healthy Dietary Adherence Score; OR Odds ratio; SDQ Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire