Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;14(4):342–351. doi: 10.1177/1479972316643699

Table 2.

A comparison of the results at peak exercise between the ITM and ICE tests.a

ITM ICE p value
Duration (seconds) 621 (97) 576 (150) 0.30
V.O2pk (mL minute−1) 2301 (535) 1814 (389) <0.001
V.O2pk (mL minute−1 kg1) 23.5 (5.6) 18.4 (4.2) <0.001
V.O2pk (% predicted) 85 [19] 68 [16] NA
V.CO2pk (mL minute−1) 2662 (755) 2135 (551) <0.001
RER 1.18 (0.08) 1.17 (0.12) 0.69
V.Epk (L minute−1) 83.3 (24.7) 66.9 (22.8) <0.001
V.O2 @ AT (mL minute−1) 1463 (238) 1208 (165) <0.001
AT (%V.O2 predicted) 58 (12) 47 (13) 0.003
HR (bpm) 144 (29) 130 (21) 0.01
HR % predicted 89 (14) 80 (13) <0.001
SpO2 (%) 98 (1) 98 (1) 0.18
BP systolic (mmHg) 165 (31) 166 (33) 0.90
BP diastolic (mmHg) 82 (13) 75 (17) 0.04
BS 6.6 (1.7) 7.1 (2.2) 0.45
LE 5.8 (2.1) 7.5 (1.6) 0.01

ITM: oncremental treadmill test; ICE: incremental cycle ergometer; HR: heart rate; SpO2: oxygen saturation; BP: blood pressure; V.O2pk: peak oxygen uptake; V.CO2pk: peak carbon dioxide elimination; RER: respiratory exchange ratio; V.E: ventilation; BS: Borg Score Breathless Scale; LE: Borg Score Leg Effort; AT: anaerobic threshold.

aMean (SD) HR predicted = 220 – age (years), NA: not applicable.