Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2018 Jan;28(1):7–16. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000317

Table 3.

Summary of effect sizes (Cohen’s d) and P values for seven novel SNPs with CYP2A6 phenotypes (enzyme activity, protein levels, and mRNA expression) in White liver donors

SNP rs ID Genotype groups
compared
CYP2A6 enzyme activity
(nmol/min/mg), N=327
CYP2A6 protein levels
(pmol/mg), N=320
CYP2A6 mRNA expression
(FPKM values), N=265



Effect size P value Effect size P value Effect size P value
rs57837628 AA vs. AG 0.53 0.002 0.57 0.0008 0.38 0.20
AA vs. GG 0.67 0.0001 0.74 <0.0001 0.27 0.75

rs7260629 TT vs. TG 0.44 0.23 0.46 0.15 0.07 >0.99
TT vs. GG 0.65 0.01 0.68 0.007 0.17 >0.99

rs7259706 CC vs. CT 0.06 0.31 0.04 0.49 0.45 0.17
CC vs. TT 0.30 0.02 0.28 0.02 0.41 0.19

rs150298687 TT vs. TC 0.48 0.02 0.48 0.02 0.44 0.27
TT vs. CC 0.60 0.004 0.62 0.002 0.32 0.80

rs56113850 TT vs. TC 0.40 0.03 0.48 0.009 0.44 0.12
TT vs. CC 0.59 0.001 0.66 0.0003 0.32 0.56

rs28399453 GG vs. GA & AA 0.39 0.04 0.28 0.11 0.17 0.91

rs8192733 GG vs. GC 0.44 0.001 0.49 0.002 0.25 >0.99
GG vs. CC 0.65 <0.0001 0.80 <0.0001 0.21 >0.99