Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;7(5):e015546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015546

Table 2.

Comparison of the accuracy of the ‘a priori’ and of the ‘updated’ algorithms for attribution of the first neuropsychiatric events in the three cohorts

Cohort No of pts A priori (original) algorithm Updated algorithm
AUC (95% CI) AUC (95% CI) p Value*
Cohort 1: Training 9 225 0.845 0.797 to 0.892 0.857 0.811 to 0.904 0.03
Cohort 2: Italian validating9 209 0.818 0.759 to 0.876 0.818 0.759 to 0.876 1.0
Cohort 3: International9 243 0.893 0.849 to 0.936 0.892 0.847 to 0.937 0.9
p Value 0.10 0.13

AUC, area under curve.

*Intracohorts comparison.

†Intercohorts comparison.