Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;35(4):387–395. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1358433

Table 5.

Knowledge and attitudesa associated with willingness to HPV vaccinate their own 12-year-old daughter among 220 Northern Norwegian GPs and public health nurses.b

Crude OR (95% CI) Multivariate OR (95% CI)
Age (in 10-year age groups) 0.73 (0.53–0.99) 0.62 (0.40–0.95)
Profession (nurses vs. GPs) 5.40 (2.39–12.25) 5.26 (1.74–15.94)
High self-reported knowledge of HPV vaccine 2.23 (1.08–4.63) 2.23 (0.78–6.33)
Correct, lifetime risk of HPV infection 2.46 (1.08–5.60) 2.24 (0.78–6.45)
Correct, percent of ca. cervix due to HPV 16/18 2.94 (1.45–5.88) 2.89 (1.18–7.05)
Not concerned about side effects 8.35 (3.56–19.58) 3.61 (1.10–11.87)
Sure of good enough effect 3.06 (1.49–6.31) 2.12 (0.79–5.67)
Not worried re. screening popularity 2.60 (1.78–5.28) 1.37 (0.523.59)
Not concerned on experts disagreement 11.95 (5.63–25.35) 7.31 (2.73–19)

All independent variables significantly associated with the dependent variable in crude log. regression analyses were included in the multivariate analysis and are shown in the table.

a

Independent variables in crude log. regression analyses included age, profession, the three self-reported variables (presented in Table 1) and three selected actual knowledge variables (top three variables in Table 2) and four selected attitude variables (top four variables in Table 3). All independent variables selected from Table 1–3 are marked in these tables withd.

b

Significant differences presented in bold.