Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 4;15(12):e2003143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003143

Table 2. Effects of trial-by-trial predictions and PEs on TF responses.

Regressor Source TF Cluster pFWEclust Fpeak Zpeak ANOVA Effect F1,16 p t16
Predictions (cue-locked) A1 9 Hz, 430 ms 0.024 9.26 3.84 Rel-Irrel 8.93 0.009 −2.99
MTG 27 Hz, 310–430 ms 0.047 8.05 3.55 Rel-Irrel 7.54 0.014 2.75
Interaction 11.51 0.004 3.39
38 Hz, 370–430 ms 0.039 8.21 3.59 Interaction 11.13 0.004 3.34
TPJ 21–27 Hz, 90–450 ms < 0.001 16.38 5.09 Rel-Irrel 5.27 0.035 2.29
V1 11–12 Hz, 330–430 ms 0.01 8.29 4.12 Rel-Irrel 4.96 0.04 −2.24
Spatial-Temporal 6.4 0.022 2.52
PEs (target-locked) TPJ 48 Hz, 270 ms 0.023 17.65 5.26 Rel-Irrel 10.95 0.004 3.31
V1 34–36 Hz, 130–350 ms < 0.001 12.40 4.47 Rel-Irrel 4.99 0.04 −2.23
Interaction 12.77 0.002 3.57
45 Hz, 90 ms 0.028 7.31 3.36 Interaction 14.84 0.001 3.85

Interaction effects correspond to a contrast of spatial (relevant > irrelevant) > temporal (irrelevant > relevant). A1, primary auditory cortex; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; PE, prediction error; Rel-Irrel, relevant-irrelevant; TF, time-frequency; TPJ, temporoparietal junction; V1, calcarine cortex.