Table 3.
Fatty Replacement adds no predictive value to SS classification models
Number of variables | Input | Point Estimate | p-value | OR | Accuracy (95% CI) | Sensitivity | Specificity | ANOVA p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 4 | Focus Score | 0.936 | 0.002 | 2.549 | 0.75 (0.667, 0.821) | 0.82 | 0.69 | N/A |
Fibrosis | 0.097 | 0.001 | 1.102 | ||||||
Age | −0.012 | 0.529 | 0.988 | ||||||
Fatty Replacement | 0.003 | 0.910 | 1.003 | ||||||
| |||||||||
B | 3 | Focus Score | 0.941 | 0.001 | 2.562 | 0.75 (0.667, 0.821) | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.91 |
Fibrosis | 0.097 | 0.001 | 1.102 | ||||||
Age | −0.011 | 0.517 | 0.989 | ||||||
| |||||||||
C | 3 | Focus Score | 0.945 | 0.001 | 2.573 | 0.758 (0.675, 0.828) | 0.836 | 0.69 | 0.53 |
Fibrosis | 0.091 | 0.001 | 1.096 | ||||||
Fatty Replacement | −0.005 | 0.849 | 0.995 | ||||||
| |||||||||
D | 2 | Focus Score | 0.938 | 0.001 | 2.554 | 0.765 (0.684, 0.835) | 0.836 | 0.704 | 0.8 |
Fibrosis | 0.091 | 0.001 | 1.095 |