Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 6;4(1):55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.06.002

Table 3.

Review of robotic ureteral reimplantation in children.

Author No. of patients Mean age (year) Operative indication Surgical approach Operative ports Mean operative time (min) Hospital stay (day) Complications Mean follow-up (week) Success rate (%)
Peters and Woo, 2005 [39] 6 10 Bilateral VUR Intravesical cohen cross-trigonal 3 (12 mm bladder dome, 2 × 8 mm operative) Not reported Range given: 2–4 Urine leak (1) Not given 83
Marchini et al., 2011 [40] 19 9.9 Unilateral (2)/bilateral (17) VUR Bilateral intravesical (Glenn-anderson or Cohen) and extravesical Not reported 232.6 1.8 Pain score >2 (8), bladder spasms (2), urinary retention (1), bladder leak (4) 84.3 92
Smith et al., 2011 [36] 25 5.75 Unilateral (17)/bilateral (8) VUR Extravesical 3 (12 mm umbilicus, 2 × 5 mm or 8 mm operative) 185 1.375 Transient urinary retention (4) 69.5 100 unilateral, 94 bilateral
Akhavan et al., 2014 [37] 50 7.2 Unilateral (22)/bilateral (28) VUR Extravesical Not reported Not reported 2.0 Febrile UTI (5), ileus (2), ureteral obstruction (2), ureteral injury (1), perinephric fluid collection (1), transient urinary retention (1), contralateral de novo VUR (5) 40.8 92.3
Grimsby et al., 2015 [42] 61 6.7 Cortical defects (35), breakthrough UTI (13), persistent VUR (12), noncompliance (1) Unilateral (29)/bilateral (32) extravesical 3 (8.5 mm umbilicus, 2 × 8.5 mm operative) Not reported Not reported Ureteral obstruction (3), urine leak (2), rehospitalization for nausea and vomiting (1) 50.9 72

UTI, urinary tract infection; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux.