Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 9;13(11):952. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167461

Table 1.

Promoter and terminator part characterization

Genetic context
Isolation (Cytometry)b Circuit (RNA‐seq)c
Promotersa 1st 2nd 1st 2nd
PTac‐PTet1 54 85 8 ± 2 17 ± 5
PBAD1‐PTet2 49 85 242 ± 118 283 ± 237
PBAD2 49 26 ± 29
PBM3R1‐PAmtR 10 75 9 ± 4 55 ± 32
PSrpR‐PLitR 41 85 37 ± 20 14 ± 4
PPhlF 80 323 ± 25
Terminators
L3S2P55 418 24 ± 6
L3S2P24 212 295 ± 176
L3S2P11 384 110 ± 89
ECK120029600 374 380 ± 98
ECK120033737 391 870 ± 344
L3S2P21 505 187 ± 127
a

The strength of the left promoter is 1st; right is 2nd.

b

Previously reported promoter strengths (in au/s) based on a fluorescent reporter (Nielsen et al, 2016), converted to au/s as described in text. Previously reported termination strengths (Chen et al, 2013).

c

Average and standard deviations are calculated from three replicates performed on different days. For promoters, all states where the promoter is predicted to be on are included and the units are au/s. For double promoters, separate strengths for each promoter are calculated as described in the text. Median terminator strengths are calculated for states where the upstream gene is on. For terminators L3S2P24 and L3S2P11 in one replicate, the data for input state −/−/+ were excluded due to a mapping bias (Appendix Fig S1).